Require Import UniMath.Foundations.UnivalenceAxiom. Definition j_type := ∑ (j : ∏ (A : UU) (a : A) (D : ∏ (b : A), a = b -> UU), D a (idpath a) -> ∏ (b : A) (p : a = b), D b p), ∏ (A : UU) (a : A) (D : ∏ (b : A) (p : a = b), UU) (d : D a (idpath a)), j A a D d a (idpath a) = d. Definition nat_trans {A : UU} (F G : A -> UU) := ∏ (a : A), F a -> G a. Definition vert_comp {A : UU} {H G F : A -> UU} (α : nat_trans G F) (β : nat_trans H G) : nat_trans H F := λ a, (α a) ∘ (β a). Notation "α # β" := (vert_comp α β). Definition yoneda_type := ∑ (y : ∏ (A : UU) (F : A -> UU) (a : A), F a -> (nat_trans (λ b, a = b) F)), (∏ (A : UU) (G F : A -> UU) (α : nat_trans G F) (a b : A) (p : a = b) (x : G a), (α # y A G a x) b p = y A F a (α a x) b p) × ((∏ (A : UU) (a b : A) (p : a = b) , (y A (λ b, a = b) a (idpath a) b) p = p) × (∏ (A : UU) (F : A -> UU) (a : A) (x : F a), y A F a x a (idpath a) = x)). Section j_to_yoneda. Context (j : j_type). Definition j_derive_transport {A : UU} (F : A -> UU): ∑ (transp : ∏ (a : A) (b : A) (p : a = b), F a -> F b), ∏ (a : A), transp a a (idpath a) = λ x, x. Proof. exists (λ a, (pr1 j) A a (λ b _, F a -> F b) (λ x, x)). exact (λ a, pr2 j A a (λ b _, F a -> F b) (λ x, x)). Defined. Definition j_derive_idtohomot {A B : UU} {f g : A -> B}: f = g -> ∏ (a : A), f a = g a := (pr1 j) (A -> B) f (λ g p, ∏ (a : A), f a = g a) (λ a, idpath _) g. Definition j_derive_path_concat {A : UU} {a b c : A}: a = b -> b = c -> a = c := (pr1 j) A a (λ b _, b = c -> a = c) (λ x, x) b. Definition j_derive_ap {A B : UU} (f : A -> B) {a b : A}: a = b -> f a = f b := (pr1 j) A a (λ b _, f a = f b) (idpath _) b. Definition j_derive_inv {A : UU} {a b : A}: a = b -> b = a := (pr1 j) A a (λ b _, b = a) (idpath _) b. Definition j_yoneda_fun (A : UU) (F : A -> UU) (a : A) (x : F a): nat_trans (λ b, a = b) F := λ b p, (pr1 (j_derive_transport F)) a b p x. Definition j_yoneda_naturality (A : UU) (G F : A -> UU) (α : nat_trans G F) (a b : A) (p : a = b) (x : G a) : (α # j_yoneda_fun A G a x) b p = j_yoneda_fun A F a (α a x) b p. Proof. apply (λ d, (pr1 j) A a (λ b p, (α # j_yoneda_fun A G a x) b p = j_yoneda_fun A F a (α a x) b p) d b). refine (j_derive_path_concat _ _). - use (j_derive_ap (α a)). + exact x. + exact (j_derive_idtohomot ((pr2 j) A a (λ b _ , G a → G b) (λ x,x)) x). - apply j_derive_inv. exact (j_derive_idtohomot ((pr2 j) A a (λ b _, F a -> F b) (λ x,x)) (α a x)). Defined. Definition j_yoneda_special (A : UU) (a b : A) (p : a = b): j_yoneda_fun A (λ b, a = b) a (idpath a) b p = p. Proof. apply ((pr1 j) A a (λ b p, j_yoneda_fun A (λ b0 : A, a = b0) a (idpath a) b p = p)). cbn. exact (j_derive_idtohomot ((pr2 j) A a (λ b _ , a = a → a = b) (λ x,x)) (idpath _)). Defined. Definition j_yoneda_from (A : UU) (F : A -> UU) (a : A) (α : nat_trans (λ b, a = b) F): F a := α a (idpath a). Definition j_yoneda_fromto (A : UU) (F : A -> UU) (a : A): (λ x, j_yoneda_from A F a (j_yoneda_fun A F a x)) = λ x, x := pr2 (j_derive_transport F) a. Definition j_derive_y : yoneda_type. exists j_yoneda_fun. apply dirprodpair. - exact j_yoneda_naturality. - apply dirprodpair. + exact j_yoneda_special. + exact (λ A F a x, j_derive_idtohomot (j_yoneda_fromto A F a) x). Defined. End j_to_yoneda. Section yoneda_to_j. Context (y_inhab : yoneda_type). Definition y := pr1 y_inhab. Definition y_naturality := pr1 (pr2 y_inhab). Definition y_special := pr1 (pr2 (pr2 y_inhab)). Definition y_inverse := pr2 (pr2 (pr2 y_inhab)). Definition y_derive_ap {A B : UU} (f : A -> B) {a b : A} (p : a = b) : f a = f b := y A (λ b, f a = f b) a (idpath _) b p. Definition y_derive_pathcomp {A : UU} {a b c : A} (p : a = b) (q : b = c) : a = c := y A (λ c, a = c) b p c q. Definition y_derive_transp {A : UU} {B : A -> UU} {a a' : A} : a = a' -> B a -> B a' := y A (λ a', B a -> B a') a (λ b, b) a'. Definition y_derive_reverse {A : UU} {a b : A}: a = b -> b = a := y A (λ x, x = a) a (idpath _) b. Definition y_total_paths {A : UU} {a b : A} (p : a = b): A -> UU := (λ x, ∑ (q : a = x), (b ,, p) = (x ,, q)). Definition y_underlying {A : UU} {a : A}: nat_trans (y_total_paths (idpath a)) (λ b, a = b) := λ _, pr1. Definition y_lift {A : UU} {a : A}: nat_trans (λ b, a = b) (y_total_paths (idpath a)) := y A (y_total_paths (idpath a)) a (idpath _ ,, idpath _). Definition y_lift_fixes_paths {A : UU} {a b : A} (p : a = b): (y_underlying # y_lift) b p = p. Proof. refine (y_derive_pathcomp _ _) ; try apply y_naturality. apply y_special. Defined. Definition y_j_fun_bad (A : UU) (a : A) (D : ∏ (b : A), a = b -> UU) (d : D a (idpath a)) (b : A) (p : a = b) : D b p. Proof. apply (y_derive_transp (y_lift_fixes_paths p)). apply (λ d', y (∑ b0 : A, a = b0) (λ bp, D (pr1 bp) (pr2 bp)) (a,,idpath _) d' (b ,, pr1 (y_lift b p))). - exact d. - exact (pr2 (y_lift b p)). Defined. Definition y_pathcomp_computes_right {A : UU} {a : A}: ∏ (b : A) (p : a = b), y_derive_pathcomp p (idpath b) = p. Proof. apply (y_j_fun_bad A a _). unfold y_derive_pathcomp. apply y_inverse. Defined. Definition y_pathcomp_reveres_computes {A : UU} {a : A}: ∏ (b : A) (p : a = b), y_derive_pathcomp (y_derive_reverse p) p = idpath b. Proof. apply (y_j_fun_bad A a _). refine (y_derive_pathcomp _ _). - apply y_pathcomp_computes_right. - exact (y_inverse A (λ x, x=a) a (idpath a)). Defined. Definition y_embed_paths1 {A : UU} {a b : A} (p : a=b): (a ,, idpath _) = (b ,, p). Proof. apply (y_derive_pathcomp (pr2 (y_lift b p))). exact (@y_derive_ap _ _ (λ q, (b,,q)) (pr1 (y_lift b p)) p (y_lift_fixes_paths p)). Defined. Definition y_embed_paths2 {A : UU} {a b : A} (p : a=b): (a ,, idpath _) = (b ,, p). Proof. refine (y_derive_pathcomp _ _). - exact (y_derive_reverse (y_embed_paths1 (idpath a))). - exact (y_embed_paths1 p). Defined. Definition y_embed_paths2_computes {A : UU} {a : A}: y_embed_paths2 (idpath a) = idpath _. Proof. unfold y_embed_paths2. apply y_pathcomp_reveres_computes. Defined. Definition y_j_fun (A : UU) (a : A) (D : ∏ (b : A), a = b -> UU) (d : D a (idpath a)) (b : A) (p : a = b) : D b p. Proof. apply (λ d', y (∑ b0 : A, a = b0) (λ bp, D (pr1 bp) (pr2 bp)) (a,,idpath _) d' (b ,, p)). - exact d. - apply y_embed_paths2. Defined. Definition y_derive_j : j_type. Proof. exists y_j_fun. intros. refine (y_derive_pathcomp _ _). unfold y_j_fun. - apply y_derive_ap. exact y_embed_paths2_computes. - exact (y_inverse (∑ b, a=b) (λ bp, D (pr1 bp) (pr2 bp)) (a ,, idpath _) d). Defined. End yoneda_to_j. Print All Dependencies y_derive_j. Print All Dependencies j_derive_y. (** This proof makes use of function extensionality twice. Notice however that it is _not_ used to derive a term of type [yoneda_type]. With [j_derive_y] alone we may construct [y_derive_j], as done above, from which we may then construct [yoneda_tofrom]. That is, in the presence of function extensionality, [yoneda_type] implies a Yoneda equivalence. *) Definition yoneda_tofrom (j : j_type) (A : UU) (F : A -> UU) (a : A) (α : nat_trans (λ b, a = b) F) : j_yoneda_fun A F a (j_yoneda_from A F a α) = α. Proof. apply isweqtoforallpaths ; intro b. apply funextfun ; intro p. apply ((pr1 j) A a (λ b p, j_yoneda_fun A F a (j_yoneda_from A F a α) b p = α b p)). unfold j_yoneda_fun. rewrite (pr2 (j_derive_transport F) a). apply idpath. Defined.