<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>ctak/src/cnn_train.py, branch lazy_queue</title>
<subtitle>An implementation of Tak and a computer opponent in C</subtitle>
<id>https://git.l-3.space/ctak/atom?h=lazy_queue</id>
<link rel='self' href='https://git.l-3.space/ctak/atom?h=lazy_queue'/>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.l-3.space/ctak/'/>
<updated>2026-08-28T18:37:41Z</updated>
<entry>
<title>Corrected generation of training data for 6s</title>
<updated>2026-08-28T18:37:41Z</updated>
<author>
<name>tslil clingman</name>
<email>tslil@posteo.de</email>
</author>
<published>2021-03-18T03:10:53Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.l-3.space/ctak/commit/?id=c9823c76dd43aa40bef3f67fa0940a78cb40bf05'/>
<id>urn:sha1:c9823c76dd43aa40bef3f67fa0940a78cb40bf05</id>
<content type='text'>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Small typo in generated output for weights</title>
<updated>2026-08-28T18:37:41Z</updated>
<author>
<name>tslil clingman</name>
<email>tslil@posteo.de</email>
</author>
<published>2021-02-05T21:37:32Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.l-3.space/ctak/commit/?id=5bc1e056412cb7d96831ab7ae32842c166b38436'/>
<id>urn:sha1:5bc1e056412cb7d96831ab7ae32842c166b38436</id>
<content type='text'>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Tried some naive iterative deepening. Work on TEI interface next</title>
<updated>2026-08-28T18:37:41Z</updated>
<author>
<name>tslil clingman</name>
<email>tslil@posteo.de</email>
</author>
<published>2021-02-02T02:46:24Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.l-3.space/ctak/commit/?id=11956b2e940f5e1839efab187d898092e819a766'/>
<id>urn:sha1:11956b2e940f5e1839efab187d898092e819a766</id>
<content type='text'>
If TEI is implemented, then i could make use of Morten's
racetrack (https://github.com/MortenLohne/racetrack) and develop a
quantitative measure of the bot's performance. This is the current
priority.
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Just some #weightgoals ;)</title>
<updated>2026-08-28T18:37:41Z</updated>
<author>
<name>tslil clingman</name>
<email>tslil@posteo.de</email>
</author>
<published>2021-02-01T04:33:39Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.l-3.space/ctak/commit/?id=328c8d1e3094a942d6a2edd933c9cc4ab09daab1'/>
<id>urn:sha1:328c8d1e3094a942d6a2edd933c9cc4ab09daab1</id>
<content type='text'>
It turns out that while i was training on a 0/1 classification
problem, i was using 2*eval - 1. Training using this function instead,
and on bot-dominated game choices (chosen_player in extract.sh) seems
to have given a better evaluation function. At the least, Morten's
swindle doesn't work anymore.
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Syntax errors, small tweak to training data generation</title>
<updated>2026-08-28T18:37:41Z</updated>
<author>
<name>tslil clingman</name>
<email>tslil@posteo.de</email>
</author>
<published>2021-01-29T19:05:06Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.l-3.space/ctak/commit/?id=fcface1079b1c44c7ccca3d117c698347c978f20'/>
<id>urn:sha1:fcface1079b1c44c7ccca3d117c698347c978f20</id>
<content type='text'>
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
