ctak/include/weights.c, branch mcuAn implementation of Tak and a computer opponent in Chttps://git.l-3.space/ctak/atom/include/weights.c/ctak/atom?h=mcu2026-08-28T18:37:41ZWent back up to 1986 weights2026-08-28T18:37:41Ztsliltslil@posteo.de2021-01-16T19:08:46Zurn:sha1:50b9955b040005e489127a11cf9c1648438a6266There was a bug in the minimax!2026-08-28T18:37:41Ztsliltslil@posteo.de2021-01-15T17:34:44Zurn:sha1:4ec810a2bb0ed393e59e0a03f8c98ec09805e989Better trained weights, an important oversight in minimax (steps <=)2026-08-28T18:37:41Ztsliltslil@posteo.de2021-01-14T20:09:39Zurn:sha1:c1773e2712c5878e5f40e47e4a463a14724f55a8
I still can't tell whether if ((ply & 1) == 0) this = this - 1.0; is
correct.
Seems tolerable, but not great. Still wont win or lose ???2026-08-28T18:37:41Ztsliltslil@posteo.de2021-01-14T06:05:45Zurn:sha1:b75526290b97e26d3fc3bbefef79f50a7febfe7dFixed minimax (!), fixed bugs in tak.c2026-08-28T18:37:41Ztsliltslil@posteo.de2021-01-14T04:41:32Zurn:sha1:cf7d665598e34e32d258775b583968e758c8f2fb
With minimax of depth 1 the evaluation function seems alright with the
current method of training and generating weights
Trying minimax2026-08-28T18:37:41Ztsliltslil@posteo.de2021-01-13T21:39:16Zurn:sha1:2ef0078ba2afd99c4fc2673497f3d3a39119cf5dWeights?2026-08-28T18:37:41Ztsliltslil@posteo.de2021-01-13T16:09:13Zurn:sha1:b4a5a693bb51a8d3e6e35c75109b55d9fcf111a5Wider?2026-08-28T18:37:41Ztsliltslil@posteo.de2021-01-13T06:20:11Zurn:sha1:5159a45573f9b9c52814047816c418c2c450fde5Trying various things to teach ti2026-08-28T18:37:41Ztsliltslil@posteo.de2021-01-13T05:18:30Zurn:sha1:cfe5e03ba00d84bd98e95d5cbc92c5de27401b12Auto-generating weights2026-08-28T18:37:41Ztsliltslil@posteo.de2021-01-12T22:01:29Zurn:sha1:91640db661fdcc04960d1f048ac60c2c4b2c5319